omz:forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Popular

    Welcome!

    This is the community forum for my apps Pythonista and Editorial.

    For individual support questions, you can also send an email. If you have a very short question or just want to say hello — I'm @olemoritz on Twitter.


    First Look at Editorial 1.1

    Editorial
    40
    116
    239697
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • SteveW928
      SteveW928 last edited by

      Came here because I saw that Text Expander was broken currently (in iOS7)... so really glad to hear it's on the fix list!

      One feature I've always wanted on iOS in any text editor, would be the ability to have two text documents open side by side or stacked (depending on iPad orientation, and need for width or height... so configurable would be nice!). That would give iOS a huge bridge towards OSX level of productivity for writers, coders, etc. Would something like this be possible to add to Editorial, especially now with iOS7?

      I've seen a couple apps try to pull something like that off, but poorly implemented. The browser/editor is an excellent step, but two documents is the key. Even if one of them had to be read-only, it would be a big help. I'm always doing research and then writing based on that research. Flipping between documents or apps just isn't efficient. It's like the #1 productivity killer for me with the iPad.

      Looks like a really great app!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • due3die
        due3die last edited by

        @Ole We are waiting for Editorial 1.1

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • peterh86
          peterh86 last edited by

          Not me, I haven't explored a fraction of 1.0 yet.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Michael
            Michael last edited by

            Hi!

            Sounds great, I'm looking forward to seeing it live on my iPad.

            What about switching the markdown engine to "real" MultiMarkdown instead of sundown? I believe this would be very helpful, even though I ignore how hard this would be to implement...

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Vijay
              Vijay last edited by

              This is a wonderful and immensely useful app. I have a suggestion/request for the next version.

              Could you support displaying equations via Mathjax in the HTML preview? I am aware that there is a workflow for this. But this workflow depends on the Mathjax CDN and hence will not work offline. It should not be difficult to have the minimal Mathjax files right within the app. Since the WebKit browser used in the HTML preview supports SVG output from Mathjax (and SVG output is also faster), the memory requirements to have the Mathjax folders right within Editorial will also be very minimal if SVG output alone is configured.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • phillipsmn
                phillipsmn last edited by

                Can't wait!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • due3die
                  due3die last edited by

                  @ole,

                  Please @omz Can't wait. Please update as-soon-as.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • the_buch
                    the_buch last edited by

                    @omz super excited. The screenshots look pretty great. Excited to check out the new features. New to Editorial still, and newer to python, so hopefully this isn't a dumb question. Could the webbrowser.can_open() function be used to determine which apps on that device have url schemes, in a way that it could pull a list or even tell you directly the schemes, or is it simply for the script's benefit? Hopefully I managed to ask what I meant. Keep working on this amazing software, and I'll keep using it. Thanks for your time and effort, cant wait!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • omz
                      omz last edited by

                      @the_buch It's unfortunately not possible to get a list of all supported URL schemes on a device (there's just no API for that), so you'd have to check a list of known ones to see which apps are installed...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • the_buch
                        the_buch last edited by

                        Okay. That makes sense. Thanks for the swift response! Have a nice day

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Michael
                          Michael last edited by

                          Sorry for asking this question again (but it was not resolved): Would the new version use a "real" MultiMarkdown engine? For people using subscript frequently (as in H~2O or H_2O for water) this is really impornant.
                          Thanks for your feedback and best regards!

                          Michael

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Jim
                            Jim last edited by

                            Hi omz,

                            Any updates for when Editorial 1.1 will be completed and released?

                            I would also love to see an iPhone and Mac version as well.

                            Jim

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • mconnors
                              mconnors last edited by

                              I've really been enjoying Editorial. Fantastic work as a whole and the 1.1 update is promising.

                              My workflow list is getting long and cumbersome. Are you considering adding the ability to organize workflows in a hierarchical structure of some kind like user-customizable folders or a similar function?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • the_buch
                                the_buch last edited by

                                I would be interested in the workflow organization feature suggested above, by mconnors as well. The list is growing at least a few times a week it seems. Of course, even without such a feature, I'm still just impressed with the fact that this exists at all.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stephenll
                                  stephenll last edited by

                                  I second the comment about having mathjax local. Most of the time I don't have wifi access on my iPad. I need to have notes with math and every other app falls short. This app would be perfect with local mathjax.

                                  Thanks.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • Vijay
                                    Vijay last edited by

                                    I tried to have a local MathJax folder in my dropbox. And it works after adding the mathjax <script>...</script> element in the markdown file with the link pointing to the local Mathjax folder.

                                    However, markdown seems to be parsing before mathjax gets control. Though a lot of the equations get parsed by mathjax, anything with a superscript is parsed by the markdown parser. Hence some of the equations look ugly.

                                    There might be other elements (in addition to superscript) where parsing fails.

                                    It should be possible to take care of this and also include a <script>...</script> to the local mathjax folder in the template used to render the HTML preview.

                                    Hoping this will appear in version 1.1 (which we are awaiting eagerly)

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • Chaosno1
                                      Chaosno1 last edited by

                                      Any news here? I am very interested in buying Editorial but I do not see any information if a update for iOS 7 will really come. Also I tried to ask questions in several ways (twitter mail and here) and never got an answer. That's really sad because good support for an paid app is important for me.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • the_buch
                                        the_buch last edited by

                                        He's probably busy. I imagine it takes a lot to develop and maintain an app like this. But to my knowledge, and I'm pretty certain, it's supposed to be in the near future. Though honestly, as good as the ios7 update screenshots look, I'd be okay with the app as it is now. It's pretty incredible. There's an excellent community here and the Workflows Directory has some good stuff. The app itself has good support really. I was unsure about buying it a few months ago until I read the MacStories review of Editorial. Check it out if you're curious and haven't already read it. It convinced me I wanted it bad enough, and needed it. There's also an iBook which is an extended version of Viticci's review there, with many workflows. If you mean info specifically about an iOS 7 update, stick around. It's definitely an awesome app as is, but I am looking forward, eagerly at that, to the iOS 7 update, judging by the screenshots above.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • Chaosno1
                                          Chaosno1 last edited by

                                          Hi and thanks for your answers here and in the other thread. Of course he may be very busy, but a short reaction should always be possible as he can do on other posts regarding the other app. Just a short notice like he is still working on it and it will come as an update (and not as a new app ;) ) would be enough for me to buy. That's really not too much I think....

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • peterh86
                                            peterh86 last edited by

                                            Ole has posted that he's working on the new version and it won't be a new app. I find him very responsive to problems and issues.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post
                                            Powered by NodeBB Forums | Contributors